New book, new way of publishing
Posted in Web, books, publishing, writing on May 1st, 2009 by scott – 1 CommentA few days ago, O’Reilly Media released a new book by Tim O’Reilly and Sarah Milstein: The Twitter Book. You can get it as an ebook, with a dead trees version coming soon. What’s interesting about the book isn’t its subject matter, but rather the way in which it was written. Believe it or not, the book was done in PowerPoint. Yes, PowerPoint. A piece of software that’s generally used to create presentation slides.
Tim O’Reilly recently blogged about the book, the writing process, and how their approach to the The Twitter Book was an attempt to reinvent the concept of the book in the age of the Web. Read O’Reilly’s post for the details.
So what does this have to do with writing?
A lot, believe it or not. Each page is self contained. In most cases, you don’t need to read other pages of the book in order for that page to make sense. This approach is very similar to a concept from technical writing: topic-based writing.
As Mike Hamilton of MadCap Software said in a session he did at DocTrain East 2008, a topic is a standalone piece of content. It doesn’t rely on information from any other piece of content in a book or manual or help system. Or anything else for that matter.
While Tim O’Reilly described how The Twitter Book was created as a different approach to publishing, it’s also a different approach to writing. In a scenario like this, you need to pack a lot of information on to a single page. The space constraints force you to write very tightly. You need to contain an idea or a concept within the alloted space.
On top of that, the type and spacing are probably larger in this kind of layout — paragraphs are probably not going to be 12 point Garamond, single spaced. This means even fewer words.
Words and images
A book like The Twitter Book is also very visual. You need to work text around the visuals; everything has to blend together. Which isn’t easy.
If you’re self publishing, then you have to be a good visual designer. Or, that the very least, have a good grasp of the concepts of design. Or, you need to engage a designer.
It’s a lot of work
Doing what O’Reilly and Milstein did with The Twitter Book is definitely a lot of work. In addition to the design, doing something like this requires:
- A lot of planning, and probably more than a couple of designs being scrapped.
- An understanding of topic-based writing.
- The ability to write tightly. And then some!
I’m not entirely sure that this approach will revolutionize the way in which books are written and published. But it does offer an opportunity to change the way in which we write. At the very least, this approach offers a different way in which to write and to present ideas.